Cliff Richard is the first artist in eight decades to hit the UK Top 5.

Cliff Richard has been the first artist in eight straight decades to reach the Top 5 of the UK album chart.

This week, his new album Music … The Air That I Breathe reaches No 3, continuing a run that stretches back to his 1959 album Cliff, recorded as No 4 for Cliff Richard and the Drifters. Two years back, he achieved his first No 1 album with 21 Today and has since topped the chart six more times.

After 2011’s Soulicious, Richard released no original music for several years and concentrated on rock’n’roll cover versions, but returned in 2018 with an album of new tracks, Rise, which also hit the UK Top 5.

He said the title was motivated by his dispute with the BBC over the reporting in 2014 of a police search of his apartment in Berkshire, which did not result in an arrest or charge. Since the bad time I went through in my life, I’ve tried to get out of what seemed like a quagmire, “he stated.”

Pop … In addition to covers like the Beatles’ Here Comes the Heat, and duets with musicians including Bonnie Tyler and Albert Hammond, The Air That I Breathe includes two new tracks.

The album chart this week is topped by the latest album Slots by Ariana Grande, with the title track leading the singles chart for a second week. With Bruce Springsteen slipping from No 1 to No 4, and Sheffield arena rockers Carry Me the Horizon joining at No 5, Sam Smith’s new album Love Goes hits No 2.

At No 9, after his album Divinely Uninspired to a Hellish Degree was released in May 2019, Lewis Capaldi marks his 77th consecutive week in the Top 10. Just Simon and Garfunkel’s Bridge Across Troubled Water, Ed Sheeran’s X, Michael Jackson’s Thriller, and Adele’s 21. are now beating the unbroken stretch.

Also, Read Article on Richard Below

The BBC will pay Sir Cliff Richard £ 2 million in court fees

The BBC paid Sir Cliff Richard about £ 2 million in court fees, ending one of the most costly and embarrassing legal proceedings in the recent history of the broadcaster, even though despite paying about £4.5 million, the singer was still left out of pocket, not any of which could be claimed back.

Last year, after using a helicopter in 2014 to record a police raid on his house, Richard secured a landmark lawsuit against the broadcaster and revealed that he was being prosecuted for allegations of historical child sexual abuse. He was never prosecuted or charged and later decided to sue the BBC over his privacy infringement.

A protracted trial exposed humiliating e-mails by BBC journalists, prompting a judge to believe that a willingness to avoid being scooped by a competing outlet had motivated the broadcaster.

The case created new legal precedents that make news sources more hesitant to name suspects who are under scrutiny but have yet to be prosecuted.

Since then, Richard has committed himself to a movement to ensure that offenders are granted anonymity before they are convicted and said that, as a result of the initial media attention, people still mistakenly think there is “no smoke without flames.”

The five-year court battle left the BBC with high nursing expenses. Initially, the company was ordered to pay Richard £210,000 in penalties for the violation of his privacy, plus more damages for the decision to recommend the story for a “scoop of the year” award.

To pay Richard’s legal expenses, the company had only turned over £850,000, but the actual bill, first recorded by the Daily Mirror, soared to around £ 2 million. This is in comparison to the £315,000 in court fees charged by the BBC to the co-defendant, the police in South Yorkshire.

“A BBC spokesman said:” We are delighted that Sir Cliff Richard, the BBC, and South Yorkshire police have reached an amicable resolution of the litigation expenses of Sir Cliff Richard. The expenses of the BBC are beyond our legitimate insurance scope.

The whole cost of the fees on both sides and the costs will be secured, but the BBC will continue to pay its insurer an excess.

The court heard during the trial that BBC reporter Dan Johnson had contacted South Yorkshire police with a tip about Richard, which prompted the police to conclude that he knew better than he did about their investigation. As they searched Richard’s home in Berkshire, the police then decided to collaborate and tipped the BBC off.

The BBC opted to defend the lawsuit, claiming that a common reporting procedure has been observed.

The event, however, prompted concerns about the judgment of top BBC executives, including Fran Unsworth, the current news chief, who was the most senior editor on staff when the story broke and signed the order to use the footage of the helicopter.

Several attorneys and television executives defended the freedom to name suspects before proceedings were laid at the time of the verdict, claiming that ads had already helped the authorities to establish prosecutions against people by convincing other witnesses to come forward.

Author: TinyQuest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *